[V19N2] – Estimating Lab Analysis Costs and Maximizing Savings in Refineries: Understanding the True Cost of Laboratory Analysis in Refining Operations

Laboratory analyses are critical for ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance in refineries. However, traditional lab-based quality control methods can be expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive.

Refineries can achieve significant cost savings without compromising quality by accurately estimating lab analysis costs and implementing strategic optimizations.


 

🟧 Key Factors Affecting Lab Analysis Costs

The cost of lab analysis in a refinery is influenced by several factors, including:

  1. Number of Samples Analyzed: The more frequently samples are taken, the higher the costs related to workforce, consumables, and testing equipment.

  2. Testing Complexity: Some tests, such as sulfur content, distillation points, and Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP), require specialized equipment and longer processing times, increasing costs.

  3. Manpower Costs: Laboratory technicians’ salaries, training, and shift coverage significantly contribute to overall lab expenses.

  4. Equipment Maintenance: Analytical instruments require routine calibration, repairs, and replacements, adding to operational expenses.

  5. Time Delays: Extended turnaround times for lab results can slow decision-making, increasing holding costs and inefficiencies.

  6. Quality Assurance Requirements: Stringent industry regulations often require extensive testing, increasing costs.


 

🟧 Estimating the Annual Cost of Lab Analysis

Refineries can estimate lab analysis costs using the following formula:

Total Annual Lab Cost = (S × Q × S ×C)

Where:

●      S = Number of process streams and tanks analyzed

●      Q = Number of quality parameters tested per sample

●      S = Number of samples taken per day

●      C = Cost per analysis, including labor, materials, and overhead

For example, in a refinery with:

●      23 process streams and 44 tanks

●      8 tests per sample

●      Sampling frequency of 3 per day for streams and 3 per week for tanks

●      An average cost of $50 per analysis

The estimated annual lab cost exceeds $1.5 million.


 

🟧 Estimating Lab Analysis Load Using the OMS-Developed SQS Model

To better estimate the load on a refinery’s lab analysis operations, the Sample Quality Score (SQS) model developed by Offsite Management Systems (OMS) can be used. The SQS model quantifies the sampling and analysis load using the equation:

SQS = S × Q × S

Where:

●      S = Number of source points (tanks or process streams)

●      Q = Number of quality analyses (QAs) performed per sample

●      S = Number of samples taken per source point

These SQS loads are based on the lab analysis schedule and separated for on-site (process units) and off-site (tanks) sampling and analysis. The frequency below indicates that off-site operations require more concentrated samples, whereas on-site operations require less concentrated samples and analysis frequencies.

Minimize image
Edit image
Delete image

1741359024818?e=1747267200&v=beta&t=mcmU3BhxilZxSmtE4E qIVnm4IaCBN nmWh JzUMpnA

Applying this model in a 300-kbpd refinery:

●      S = 23 streams + 44 tanks

●      Q ranges from 2 to 12 per sample

●      S = 3 per day for streams, 3 per week for tanks

This parameter allows the refinery to assess lab workload distribution and identify areas for optimization.


 

🟧 Breakdown of Laboratory Costs

To further understand cost distribution, refineries should consider the following:

Minimize image
Edit image
Delete image


 

🟧 Cost-Saving Strategies for Refinery Lab Operations

Refineries can optimize lab analysis costs by implementing the following strategies:

  1. Reducing Sampling Frequency: Implementing a Tank Quality Tracking System (TQTS) allows for real-time monitoring, reducing the need for frequent lab sampling.

  2. Selective Testing: Identifying critical quality parameters and focusing on essential tests rather than redundant analyses can significantly lower costs.

  3. Automation and Online Analyzers: Installing real-time analyzers for key properties (e.g., sulfur, RVP, and octane number) reduces reliance on manual sampling and improves efficiency.

  4. Process Optimization: Refining process control through advanced monitoring reduces product variations and the need for excessive lab testing.

  5. Predictive Maintenance of Lab Equipment: Implementing condition-based monitoring prevents unexpected breakdowns and costly repairs.

  6. Improved Scheduling and Logistics: Coordinating lab schedules with production demands prevents bottlenecks and optimizes technician workloads.

  7. Centralized Data Management: Digitalizing lab records and integrating them with refinery-wide systems improves efficiency and reduces administrative costs.


 

🟧 Case Study: Cost Reduction through TQTS Implementation

A major refinery that implemented a Tank Quality Tracking System reported:

●      Reduction in Lab Testing Costs by 30%: Fewer manual samples were needed due to online quality estimation.

●      $500,000 Annual Savings: Lower operational and labor costs resulted in significant financial benefits.

●      Increased Operational Efficiency: Faster decision-making and reduced blending rework.

●      Improved Compliance & Product Consistency: Enhanced accuracy in final product certification.

Minimize image
Edit image
Delete image


 

🟧 The Financial Impact of Optimized Lab Analysis

A refinery that optimizes its lab analysis processes can achieve:

●      Annual savings of up to $500,000 by reducing sampling frequency and test redundancy.

●      Faster Decision-Making by shifting from batch-based lab analysis to real-time quality tracking.

●      Refineries can significantly increase their throughput by minimizing delays in product certification and blending operations. This reassures the audience about the process’s efficiency and potential for increased productivity.

●      Reduction in Quality Giveaways by ensuring optimal blend quality with real-time monitoring.


 

🟧 Long-Term Benefits of Cost Optimization

By optimizing lab analysis processes, refineries can:

●      Enhance Profitability: Lower operational costs directly impact the bottom line.

●      Improve Compliance: Meet industry regulations efficiently with streamlined lab operations.

●      Increase Productivity: Free up lab resources for higher-value tasks.

●      Strengthen Competitive Advantage: Faster, data-driven decision-making leads to more responsive operations.


 

🟧 Conclusion: A Smarter Approach to Lab Analysis Cost Management

Refineries can significantly reduce operational expenses by accurately estimating lab costs and implementing strategic optimizations. Integrating real-time tracking systems, optimizing test frequency, and leveraging automation are essential for cost-effective and efficient refinery operations.

Contact us today for a customized cost assessment and strategy for reducing lab analysis expenses!


 

Disclaimer: OMS eLearning Academy and ChatGPT collaborated as Humans and AI to generate this article for you.


 

Stay tuned for more groundbreaking publications and enrich your expertise with OMS Academy. 🌐✨

Sign up today to start your learning journey.


 

➡️ Sign Up Now 🚀


 

Thank you for being a part of the OMS eLearning Academy community.

If you have any questions or feedback, please contact us.

“At OMS eLearning Academy, excellence in education isn’t just our goal; it’s our promise – a promise to fuel minds and forge futures in Downstream Refining.”

– Estimating Lab Analysis Costs and Maximizing Savings in Refineries: Understanding the True Cost of Laboratory Analysis in Refining Operations" sku=""]
Explore Our Courses